ELFIN MAGICAL DIARIES

Home

The Elfin Gallery

About the Elfin Magical Diary

New at Elfin!

Contact

Articles

Links

The Elfin Shop

 

ARTICLES

Scientific Proof of Life After Death

Aromatherapy - Its History and Uses

Aromatherapy Oil Recipes

The Magical and Medical Uses of Herbs

The Chakras

Prophecies of the New Millennium

by Val Dobson

published in the 2000 edition of the Elfin Magical Diary

In the run-up to the Millennium, Doomsday predictions are rife. People are becoming seriously worried that some sort of world-wide disaster will hit at or around the beginning of the year 2000. All sorts of prophecies and forecasts are being published, all of them gloomy.

So what are the chances of the world coming to an end in the next year or so? Well, take a look at some prophecies that didn't come to pass:

So, given the track record of Doomsday prophets so far, it would seem there is little cause for panic.

 

Prophets and losses

Prophets' success rates are astonishingly low. For instance, I came across a reference to a 'premonitions bureau' in New York that, over twelve years, collected some 5,000 predictions; apparently only 49 of them turned out to be accurate. Wanting to find out for myself how accurate these forty-nine premonitions were, I was unable to discover anything more about this organisation; I strongly suspect that if many of those prophecies were precisely on-target (with dates, place-names etc.) then this bureau would still be in existence and we would all know about its successes.

If you make enough predictions, a few will turn out to be reasonably correct simply by chance. If only half the adults in Britain remembered one dream a night, that would be some 20 million dreams remembered; inevitably, one or two of these twenty million night-time visions will resemble some real incident that happens a day or two later. And take that "I have this feeling that I must not go on this train/bus/plane" feeling that most of us have at one time or other; again, sheer chance is likely to dictate that at some time, a train/bus/plane will crash just after some person who was about to board it had obeyed this premonition.

But, even given this chance effect, it is still astonishing how few predictions turn out to be right. Out of the many hundreds I came across in researching this article, only one prediction, the precise date of the breakup of the Soviet Union, was correct (it was published in an astrology book in 1981).

On investigation, practically all the other so-called accurate predictions turned out to have been anything but. Either they were published after the event. To quote a few: "X had a vivid dream showing every detail of the disaster hours before it occurred"; "This was foretold in an ancient manuscript kept in a locked room inside the Vatican"; "These amazing writings were carefully preserved and passed down through five generations of a Yugoslavian family".

Or they were so vague that they could be applied to just about any event - "God's light will be seen in the clouds between 1958 and 1998"; "The world will be in horrible turmoil by the turn of the century"; "There will be a plane crash in the second half of the year - America will be involved".

 

Nostradamus

The quatrains of Nostradamus are especially prone to this. Written in an obscure French dialect, filled with codes, anagrams and Latin phrases, and with almost no dates or names clearly given, they can and have been interpreted in almost any manner. Take the famous 'Eclipse' quatrain, Quatrain 72 of Century 10, which is claimed by practically every writer on Nostradamus to refer to events surrounding the August 1999 solar eclipse:

"L'an mil cens nonante neuf sept mois

Du ciel viendra grand Roy deffraieur

Reusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois.

Anuant apres Mars regener par bon heur."

Now there is no dispute about the translation of the first line. It clearly translates as "The year 1999 and seven months". But, where is the reference to an eclipse? And isn't August the eighth month anyway? As an astrologer, Nostradamus made quite frequent references to planetary conjunctions and movements; also, it was possible in his time to predict the dates of eclipses several centuries in advance with fair accuracy. So why didn't he specifically mention this eclipse? Additionally, he was writing at a time when the year started on March 25th and when the Julian Calendar (some ten or eleven days behind our modern Gregorian calendar) was being observed, so his 'seventh month' might well be our September or October. Or, as an astrologer, he could have been referring to Libra, the seventh astrological 'month - September/October, again. Or the number seven could have held some occult or alchemical significance to him that is lost to us today. This illustrates just some of the difficulties in interpreting Nostradamus.

It has been suggested that he wrote in a deliberately coded style to avoid attracting the interest of the Catholic Inquisition. This might be relevant if all of his predictions were about events within his era (as some researchers have argued). But why would he be worried that the Inquisition would be interested in a prediction that would not be fulfilled for centuries? And what of the other three lines? They are not so easily translated. Just three of the many interpretations are:

"A great terrifying leader will come through the skies to revive the great conqueror of Anglouleme. Before and after, war will rule luckily."

"From the skies shall come an alarmingly powerful king, to raise again the great King of Jaquerie. Before and after, Mars will reign again at will."

"From the sky will come the great King of Terror. He will bring back to life the great king of the Mongols. Before and after, War reigns happily."

I will leave it to readers to decide which of these translations best fit the events of August (or July, or September, or October) 1999.

A further difficulty with Nostradamus is that over the centuries, many of his quatrains were forged or doctored to favour some ruler or country. This happened especially during the Second World War, when both the Germans and the British produced dozens of bogus quatrains, some of which are still appearing in books about Nostradamus. So, altogether, the writings of Michel Nostradamus, although fascinating, cannot really be taken as a blueprint for history.

 

2012 and all that

So what of the future? Now that it is fairly obvious that the more spectacularly unpleasant end-of-the-world scenarios will not come to pass before midnight on December 31st 1999, there is a popular idea that the ancient Mayans forecast the end of the world for 21st December 2012.

This is a misconception - the Mayans never predicted anything, least of all the "end of the world". They constructed their calender in a series of ever-larger cycles (so many days made a tun, so many tuns made a katun, so many katuns made a baktun etc.), in much the same was as we construct our calender in months, years, centuries and millennia. Just as our year 2000 marks the end of a thousand-year cycle, the 2012 date is the end of a Mayan cycle (of 13 baktuns) as measured from the start of the Mayan calender in 3114BC - the Mayans considered that this date was the start of Creation, so the end of such a major cycle would have been considered important by them. But it would not have been seen as the end of the world, as they had even larger calendrical cycles - the largest stretched to 63 million years!

 

Headlines from the future

Here is a list of some other world predictions, culled from a wide variety of sources, made for the year 2000 and later:

 

The rest of the century:

So there you have it - the chronicles of the 21st Century! We'll leave the last word to Winston Churchill: "You know, I always avoid prophesying beforehand. It is much better policy to prophesy after the event has taken place."

 

Note: the list of prophecies above were collected from a variety of sources; alas, I kept no notes of which came from where! And the paragraph on the Mayan 2012 prophecy has been rewritten and expanded since the original publication. - Val Dobson